mira

AI Needs a Truth Filter
Artificial intelligence is the most powerful technology of our generation — and also one of its most unreliable. Every day, billions of people interact with AI systems that generate confident but completely false information, a problem widely known as hallucination. From healthcare to finance and legal research, unchecked AI errors cause real-world harm at a scale that is growing faster than any institution can manage.
Mira Network was built to solve this. It is a decentralized AI verification protocol that transforms unreliable AI outputs into cryptographically verified, auditable results — building the trust layer the AI era has been missing. With over 4 million active users, 19 million verified queries processed weekly, and a 96% accuracy rate already achieved on its live network, Mira is not a whitepaper promise. It is working infrastructure with real adoption, real backers, and a real role in the future of both AI and blockchain.
In September 2025, Mira launched on Binance as the 45th project in the prestigious HODLer Airdrop programme — one of the most coveted positions in crypto. This article covers everything you need to know about Mira Network, the MIRA token, and why this is one of the most compelling infrastructure opportunities in Web3 today.

The Problem: Unverified AI at Scale
Modern AI systems are fundamentally probabilistic — they generate outputs based on statistical patterns, not verified truth. The consequences are already visible. AI-generated misinformation has influenced elections. Fabricated legal citations have gone unchallenged in courts. Flawed medical recommendations have misled patients. The more deeply AI is embedded in critical systems, the more dangerous these errors become.
What has been missing is a verification layer — a decentralized, trustless system that checks AI outputs against independent sources, issues cryptographic proof of accuracy, and creates an auditable on-chain record. Mira Network is that layer. By decomposing AI outputs into individual verifiable claims and distributing them across a network of independent validator nodes — each running different AI models — Mira achieves consensus-based truth verification at a scale no centralized system could match. The result: a 90% reduction in AI hallucination rates and 96% verified accuracy across all live queries.

How Mira Works
Mira's verification process operates in three stages. First, claim decomposition breaks an AI response into its smallest verifiable units — individual facts evaluated independently rather than as a whole. Second, distributed verification sends each claim to multiple validator nodes running different AI models, which evaluate it independently and reach consensus — mirroring scientific peer review without coordination. Third, cryptographic attestation records the consensus result on-chain as an immutable, timestamped proof that any developer, enterprise, or regulator can inspect at any time.
Mira's Verified Generate API — fully OpenAI-compatible — gives developers access to this entire pipeline with minimal integration effort. The Mira Flows marketplace extends this further with ready-made, pre-verified AI packages for common tasks like summarisation, data extraction, and content analysis.
The Team and Backing
Mira was co-founded by three technologists with deep experience across AI, DeFi, and enterprise infrastructure. Karan Sirdesai (CEO) previously led investments at Accel and BCG, with a portfolio that includes Polygon and Nansen. Siddhartha Doddipalli (CTO) was a senior architect at FreeWheel (Comcast) and CTO of Stader Labs, one of DeFi's largest liquid staking protocols. Ninad Naik (COO) was General Manager at Amazon Alexa and a product lead at Uber — giving Mira rare consumer-scale AI product experience at the leadership level.
In June 2024, Mira raised $9 million in seed funding co-led by BITKRAFT Ventures and Framework Ventures, with participation from Accel, Mechanism Capital, and Folius Ventures. Two node sale events in December 2024 and January 2025 raised a further $850,000, bootstrapping the decentralized validator network. In August 2025, the Mira Foundation launched a $10 million Builder Fund to drive ecosystem grants, developer onboarding, and strategic partnerships — including a notable collaboration with Kaito.

The MIRA Token
The MIRA token has a fixed total supply of 1 billion, distributed to reflect a clear philosophy: the network belongs to those who use it, build on it, and secure it. The official allocation is as follows — Ecosystem Reserve 26%, Core Contributors 20%, Node Rewards 16%, Foundation 15%, Early Investors 14%, Initial Airdrop 6%, and Liquidity Incentives 3%. At the Token Generation Event on September 26, 2025, the initial circulating supply was 19.12% — equal to 191,244,643 MIRA tokens.
MIRA serves four core functions in the ecosystem. It is the staking currency that node operators must lock to participate in verification, with slashing penalties for dishonest behaviour ensuring network integrity. It is the payment token for the Verified Generate API and Flows marketplace. It is the governance token that gives holders binding votes over protocol upgrades and emission parameters. And it serves as the foundational trading pair for ecosystem tokens, creating dual demand across every application built on Mira's infrastructure.

Live Products with Real Users
Mira's ecosystem is already live and actively used. Klok is Mira's multi-model AI chatbot that aggregates outputs from several leading AI models and runs them through Mira's verification layer before delivering responses — giving users accuracy that no single model can match alone. Astro is Mira's AI-powered search tool, delivering web search results that are verified for accuracy before being shown to the user. Both Klok and Astro have each surpassed 500,000 users. Learnrite applies Mira's verification infrastructure to generate reliable educational content at scale.
Across all products and integrations, Mira attracts 4 to 5 million active users and processes over 19 million verified queries every week, handling up to 300 million tokens of data per day. These are live operational metrics from a mainnet that launched on September 26, 2025 — not projections.

The Binance Listing
On September 25, 2025, Binance announced Mira Network as the 45th project in its HODLer Airdrops programme. A total of 20 million MIRA tokens — 2% of total supply — were distributed to eligible holders Simple Earn subscribers who held positions during the snapshot window from September 20 to 22, 2025. Trading launched on September 26, 2025, with pairs across MIRA with all major coins— providing global liquidity across all major markets.
Inclusion in Binance's HODLer Airdrop programme is reserved for projects with genuine technical merit and demonstrated ecosystem traction. For Mira, this listing is external validation from the world's largest exchange — confirmation that this is infrastructure, not speculation.

What Comes Next
Mira's roadmap focuses on three parallel tracks. On the technical side, the team is advancing zero-knowledge proof integration, SQL compatibility for enterprise environments, and cross-chain interoperability across all the major chains. On the product side, Mira SDK expansion will make it easier for developers to build full-stack AI applications with built-in verification, payments, memory, and compute primitives. On the ecosystem side, the $10 million Builder Fund will drive grants, hackathons, and educational programmes that grow the developer community around Mira's infrastructure.
Long-term, the protocol aims to move beyond verifying AI outputs toward generating verified outputs directly — eliminating the trade-off between AI speed and AI accuracy entirely. Governance will progressively decentralise, transferring more protocol control to MIRA token holders as the network matures.
Final Word What I THINK
The problem of AI accountability is not going away — it is getting more urgent with every month that AI takes on greater responsibility in higher-stakes domains. Mira Network has built the infrastructure that addresses this problem at scale, and has done it with a working product, a funded team, institutional backing, and a live Binance listing.
The MIRA token gives the global crypto community direct participation in the growth of this infrastructure. For those who believe that transparency is not optional in an AI-powered future
Mira is the project to watch!!!!
#mira $MIRA @mira_network

Every Web3 community reaches this moment: the surge of new faces in the Discord sidebar, questions that used to live in private threads suddenly appearing in public, and a dawning realization that the shorthand that carried you through year one now excludes the people you want to keep. MIRA Network is in that moment. The right response is not a billboard slogan but a patient, grown-up introduction—who we are, how the pieces fit, and what happens next when the applause dies down. So here is the baseline. MIRA Network is a Swiss-registered company headquartered in Zug, building a blockchain ecosystem aimed at a specific, duller-than-hype target: tokenized real-world assets and a revenue-sharing model that treats community members as stakeholders rather than exit liquidity. That is the contract we are trying to honor, and it is worth explaining in full sentences.
Start with place, because place is policy. Zug is not a set; it is a choice with consequences. Switzerland brings a legal tradition that does not evaporate between cycles, a cantonal government that answers questions with forms instead of memes, and a calendar of audits and filings you can plan around. This is not regulatory cosplay. It means our corporate structure can be read by bank compliance officers without interpretive dance, that our board minutes look normal, and that token design conversations happen in the presence of constraints that are written down. That sounds bureaucratic until the day a partner’s risk team asks who is legally responsible for what—and everyone exhales because the answer exists on paper. Zug makes promises legible. It does not guarantee they will be kept, but it raises the price of breaking them, which is the kind of friction serious products need.
The chain itself, MIRA-20, follows a PoSA—Proof of Staked Authority—approach. Strip away the acronym soup and the idea is simple: combine validator accountability with stake-weighted security so that the network can aim for finality and predictable performance without resorting to theatrics. PoSA is not a panacea; it asks us to be candid about validator standards, key management, and on-call rotations, because when real-world assets are involved, downtime is not a meme—it is someone’s property record. The design goal is not the highest headline throughput but consistent latency and a risk posture you can explain at a kitchen table. Developers who build on MIRA-20 get a reasonably EVM-compatible surface with guardrails that reflect custody realities: events you can audit, permissions you can justify, and upgrade paths that require rehearsals. The chain is the floor, not the furniture. The real product is what people put on it.
Which brings us to the problem MIRA cares about: tokenizing real-world assets without turning deeds into casino chips. Real estate shares, invoices, fund interests, revenue rights—these are boring, legally encumbered objects, and they resist pure crypto improvisation. The pitch is not to eliminate intermediation but to encode economic rights in ways that make settlement, distribution, and ownership history auditable. That requires careful ontologies: what the token represents, who can transfer it, where disputes go, how corporate actions are reflected on-chain. It means working with counsel who know company law, not just token standards. Done badly, asset tokenization becomes a screenshot with a hash; done properly, it becomes an operable cap table, a dividend rail, a secondary headline you can explain to compliance without blushing. MIRA’s claim is that Web3 already has the plumbing for this, but few teams want to answer the boring calls at 4 p.m. on a Friday. We are building for those calls.
For community members, the second half of the promise is revenue sharing. That phrase drags a lot of baggage, so let’s be precise. The point is not to lure yield tourists with a big APY that decays once the chart flattens. It is to align incentives so that usage of the network—transaction fees, contract activity, services built on top—flows through transparent mechanics to stakeholders who contribute to security and growth. That requires restraint: clear formulas, cadences that make sense, and the humility to under-promise early. It also means publishing failures, because any system that distributes cash will be gamed; what matters is how quickly you notice and how clearly you say what you changed. The Swiss context helps here—structured reporting is cultural—and the design priority is legibility over lustre.
All of this sounds neat on a landing page; reality is rougher. Compliant systems are slower. Audits catch things you missed, sometimes weeks before launch. Institutional counterparts ask for documentation instead of vibes, and that documentation takes time. PoSA chains still face validator cartel risks, governance capture, and the eternal tug-of-war between upgrade speed and operational safety. Real-world assets bring oracles and off-chain truth, which means you need processes stronger than your smart contracts. MIRA’s mitigation is not a bill of features but a tempo: milestones written in public, postmortems that read like receipts, and a product calendar that respects compliance as a dependency, not an afterthought. The trade-off is that growth can look measured when speculators want vertical. That is fine. The goal is to be open next year and credible in five.
What does this mean for builders? If you have been burned by testnet-forever chains that scatter when mainnet appears, you will notice small differences here: roadmaps with actual dates (and missed dates listed, too), support responses that reference logs instead of hope, upgrade playbooks that insist on rehearsal. If you are a company evaluating RWA tokenization, you will meet a team that would rather explain why something cannot be done than pretend it can. If you are a new community member, you will see documentation first and memes second, which feels odd until the day you need an answer and it exists. None of this guarantees that MIRA will win—markets are strange, regulators evolve, and code breaks—but it does increase the odds that we fail for the right reasons, learn publicly, and keep our promises repairable.
The context is also urgent in a quiet way. Rates normalization and risk recalibration have pushed institutions to look again at blockchain tooling that previously smelled like a party. Meanwhile, retail users are tired of theatre and hungry for products that stay open during volatility. Zug’s rulebook, PoSA’s restraint, and the RWA focus are all part of one answer: build for the middle, where legality meets utility. The old cycle surged by inventing assets and then begging for markets; the next cycle may grow by taking assets people already own and making them work better. That is not a hack. It is bookkeeping, with better UX.
So to the new members: welcome, and thank you for caring enough to ask. MIRA Network is what it says on the tin—a Swiss company in Zug, a PoSA-based chain called MIRA-20, and an RWA-first ecosystem that wants revenue sharing to be legible rather than loud. We will publish the milestones, miss a few honestly, and keep the filings current. We will work with validators who wake up for alarms and lawyers who read footnotes. We will try to earn the boring kind of trust that compounds. If that matches your tempo—if you prefer warranties to fireworks, runbooks to retweets—then stick around. The work ahead is unglamorous and specific, and it matters more than it sounds. Web3 does not need another manifesto. It needs a network that answers email at 9 a.m. on a Monday and still works at 9 p.m. during a storm. That’s the promise. That’s the build.
@Mira - Trust Layer of AI #mira $MIRA

#mira $MIRA The AI boom has brought incredible tools, but it has also brought a massive challenge: AI hallucinations. We’ve all seen AI confidently state something that is completely wrong. In high-stakes fields like finance, legal, or healthcare, "mostly right" isn't good enough. This is exactly where @Mira - Trust Layer of AI _network is stepping in to bridge the gap.

​The Problem: The AI "Black Box"
​Current AI models are centralized and often opaque. When an AI gives an answer, you have to take it at face value. This lack of transparency is the single biggest barrier to the mass adoption of AI in professional industries.
​The Solution: The Mira Trust Layer
​Mira Network doesn't just build another AI; it builds the verification layer for all of them. Here is how it works:
​Atomic Claims: Mira breaks down complex AI responses into small, verifiable facts.​Consensus Verification: It sends these claims to a decentralized network of independent verifier nodes.​Multi-Model Logic: By using a "collective intelligence" approach, Mira can boost AI accuracy from the industry average of 70% to an impressive 96%.
​Trending Now: The 250,000 $MIRA CreatorPad Campaign
​If you’ve been following the Binance Square charts lately, you’ll notice the buzz around the CreatorPad. From February 26 to March 11, 2026, Binance is hosting an exclusive campaign where creators can share a massive 250,000 $mira token pool. This initiative isn't just about rewards; it's about educating the community on how decentralized AI verification will prevent the first "$100M AI agent failure.
​Why the $MIRA Token Matters
​As the native utility token, $MIRA is the fuel for this entire ecosystem. It is used for:
​Node Staking: Securing the network and ensuring honest verification.​API Fees: Developers use $mira to access the verification layer for their apps.​Governance: Token holders help shape the future of the decentralized AI roadmap.
​In 2026, the mantra is no longer "Don't trust, verify"—it's "Don't trust, use Mira." 🛡️
​#Mira #AI #Web3 #DecentralizedAI #BinanceSquare

The question sounds simple—why Zug?—but the answer is a small map of where blockchain goes when it stops pretending it might outrun the law. MIRA Network’s choice to headquarter in Zug, Switzerland, is not a branding exercise or a flag of convenience. It is a bet on continuity, on rules that can be read without a lawyer’s flashlight, and on a civic habit of treating new technology like infrastructure rather than spectacle. Call it Crypto Valley if you want the nickname; call it a municipality with sensible forms and banks that return phone calls if you want the reality. Zug sits at the intersection that young protocols rarely admit they need: legitimacy that is boring, legal clarity that survives elections, and a neighbor list that includes Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cardano, and Tezos. That kind of address does not guarantee success, but it raises the cost of shortcuts and rewards teams that plan to be around in a decade.
For most of Web3’s first act, geography masqueraded as marketing. Teams registered wherever paperwork was fastest, announced global headquarters in city-states that could fit in a convention hall, and pasted skyline photos onto token sites. Then the enforcement calls started, the stablecoin test cases landed, and custodians began asking for the one thing whitepapers cannot mint: reasonable certainty about what regulator sits down the street. Zug’s quiet appeal is that it answered those questions before they became emergencies. Switzerland’s financial tradition has a spine—banks, insurance, commodities—and when blockchain arrived, cantons like Zug built frameworks that allowed experimentation without abandoning basic guarantees: antimoney laundering expectations that are clear, custody standards that map to existing law, and a government posture that treats innovation as a process, not a press release. MIRA did not pick Zug to hide; it picked Zug so counterparts know where to send the subpoena and the term sheet. That kind of legibility is priceless when your roadmap includes institutional partners who cannot afford regulatory improv.
The gravitational pull of Crypto Valley is not mystical; it is human. If you walk five minutes in Zug, you will run into protocol foundations, auditors fluent in smart-contract risk, and policy officers who have seen three cycles of enthusiasm. That proximity creates a kind of lubricant. Hiring is easier when candidates already understand Swiss corporate forms. Counsel is sharper when lawyers have negotiated past token launches. Banks are less alarmed when they recognize the custodian on the other side. The city does not guarantee introductions, but it compresses the time between “we should talk” and “here is our preferred jurisdiction clause.” MIRA’s employees feel this in mundane ways—standardized board minutes, predictable tax treatment for option grants, meeting rooms where public-sector attendees show up because the train actually arrives. Innovation benefits from friction, yes, but not the kind that comes from chasing notaries across borders. Zug removes that category of drag so the team can argue about consensus parameters instead of apostilles.
There is a practical layer as well, the part that never makes headlines but determines whether a startup makes payroll while drafting a governance framework. Switzerland is pro-technology without being gullible—officials encourage pilots, cantons fund sandboxes, and the default response to blockchain is not panic but paperwork. For MIRA, that meant it could plan its corporate structure with an accountant instead of a prophet. It could open accounts without theater, file annual reports that human beings read, and design token mechanics with statutes in mind rather than in hope. This is not the same as regulatory capture or a golden hallway to pre-approval; it is simply clarity. When laws are written down and updated at a human cadence, builders learn to respect constraints and users learn to trust that someone is checking the doors at night. Zug’s frameworks may evolve, but they do so in public, which is the opposite of the trapdoor some jurisdictions keep behind friendly tweets.
None of this elides the trade-offs, because romanticizing Zug would just repeat the mistakes of romanticizing any blockchain hub. The canton is small, expectations are high, and legal certainty is not free—it requires compliance work, careful disclosures, and the discipline to leave press-release language to consumer apps. For a team used to moving with only GitHub for policy, that can feel like shackles. Talent can be expensive, and not every engineer wants to trade beach photos for train schedules. Moreover, the very density of serious projects means noise still exists, only in tailored suits: conferences that sound like policy seminars, job interviews that begin with “show me your risk register.” MIRA’s bet is that these frictions are features, not bugs. If you accept slower early days in exchange for fewer existential surprises later, you build differently—more documentation, more rehearsals of failure, more time spent with auditors who ask unglamorous questions. That approach will not win meme contests, but it raises the probability that in five years the company’s biggest scandal is a delayed feature, not a frozen account.
The environment also shapes strategy. In Zug, it is normal to think about counterparties who perform due diligence on your due diligence—asset managers who want to read your incident playbook, stablecoin issuers who ask for runbooks, custodians who ask for keys and call-back procedures. MIRA’s product choices will reflect that audience. Settlement finality matters. Upgradability gets paired with communication plans. Governance proposals include rollback scripts. These habits bleed into culture: job candidates are asked about outages they caused and how they wrote them up; postmortems are published because opacity is costlier than embarrassment. The city does not mandate virtue, but it makes immaturity conspicuous. That cultural osmosis is perhaps Zug’s biggest export. The same effect helped Ethereum mature through messy hard forks and helped Polkadot articulate its governance early; MIRA now learns in the same ambient classroom.
The future implied by this address is not dramatic. It is the boring scenario where blockchain finds its way into supply-chain pilots, institutional settlement trials, and municipal services that require paperwork and survive procurement committees. MIRA’s presence in Zug does not produce that future by itself, but it increases the odds that the team will still be answering support tickets when regulators somewhere else are writing indictments for people they met at a yacht party. The location signals orientation: rules, not loopholes; operations, not slogans. And if the next cycle rewards durability over velocity, Zug will look less like a nostalgic nod to Crypto Valley and more like the adult option everyone eventually considers.
So when MIRA says it chose Zug because it is building to last, read that literally. The canton offers laws you can bookmark, neighbors who have survived boom-bust-therapy, and institutions that expect phone numbers to work. Will it protect MIRA from bad product decisions? No. Will it make fundraising automatic? No. But it will make promises legible and failures repairable, which is the closest thing to a moat Web3 has found that does not evaporate after a tweet. In another year the list of big names in the valley will grow, and a few will leave. Zug itself will stay: precise, Swiss, unmoved by the daily sentiment market. And teams that set up shop there for the right reasons will keep building in ordinary time—quarters, audits, upgrades, and the quiet trust that comes from choosing accountability as your default setting.
@Mira - Trust Layer of AI

現代AIの核心には微妙な錯覚があります。モデルが出力を生成する際、法的推論、財務分析、または医療ガイダンスであっても、それは決定的に感じられます。洗練された言語は心理的権威を生み出します。自信は確実性を模倣します。
しかし技術的には、すべてのAIの応答は文に圧縮された確率分布です。それは真実ではありません。それは主張です。
歴史的に、主張は裁定を必要とします。
市場は価格を裁定します。裁判所は責任を裁定します。科学は複製を通じて仮説を裁定します。しかし、現在のAIスタックでは、出力は構造化された挑戦なしに消費されることが多いです。モデルが話し、ユーザーが受け入れます。

最初にMira Networkを見たとき、私はそれを気にしませんでした。そして、それが正直な真実です。なぜなら、暗号通貨は大きな主張で満ちており、AIはさらに大きな約束で満ちているからです。誰かがブロックチェーンを使ってAIの信頼性を改善していると言うと、私の脳は自動的にマーケティングの角度を想定します。しかし、AIシステムがどのように振る舞うかを見るにつれて、その懐疑心は徐々に好奇心に変わっていきました。なぜなら、私たちはAIが知的に聞こえるが、常に信頼できるとは限らない奇妙な段階に達しているからです。そして、人々は自信のある言葉が正確さに等しいかのように、その上に真剣な製品を構築し続けています。その自信と真実の間のギャップは小さくなく、それは危険です。特に、AIエージェントが金融、健康、研究、法的助言、さらにはロボティクスに触れ始めるとき、状況は変わります。その瞬間、質問は「AIは回答を生成できるか？」から「AIはその回答を証明できるか？」に変わります。

@mira_network #mira $MIRA Биткоин-майнер MARA Holding опубликовал финансовый отчет за четвертый квартал 2025 года. Чистый убыток составил $1,7 млрд против прибыли $528,3 млн годом ранее.

Причиной снижения показателя стала отрицательная переоценка цифровых активов на $1,5 млрд на фоне падения первой криптовалюты на 30% за три месяца. Фирма является вторым по величине держателем биткоина. Под ее управлением — 52 850 BTC стоимостью $3,5 млрд.
Выручка снизилась на 6% — до $202,3 млн. За предыдущий аналогичный отчетный период показатель составил $214,4 млн.

По итогам всего 2025 года MARA зафиксировала чистый убыток в $1,31 млрд (против прибыли $541 млн в 2024). При этом годовая выручка выросла с $656,4 млн до $907,1 млн.

Компания увеличила мощности на 25% — до 66,4 EH/s, но намайнила только 2011 BTC — меньше, чем в третьем квартале (2144 монет). Количество добытых блоков упало на 15% — до 595. Себестоимость электроэнергии при этом выросла с $31 608 до $48 611 за BTC.