Hello everyone 🤠 👋 I want to get your attention on an important Matter. and that is. How do many people are using fake edited profits screenshot to deceive you and how a single image or picture gets circulated and everyone says it's their own I'll be showing this by using some screenshots of creators doing this.
See this guy. He is saying "if success looks like Photoshop to you, that's your limitation-not my reality". But reality... His image is edited.he have opened a sell position. And his stop loss in $SAPIEN trade is showing at 0.480. and his entery price is at 0.484. which is not possible. Because in sell position his stop loss should have been higher than his entry price.This 2nd guy. Saying he made a crazy profit in $AIA short position but if you look closely, his mark price is already at 0.0087. But even right now. AIA haven't reached that high price. This is edited too
See these images. how both of these traders are using same image. and acting like they made the profits. While none of them actually did anything
Even 1 of my post about bob. Was copied 2 times by these people. And that too. Word to word. Images copied.
Why i always get confused when someone share too high profits screen shot. This is why you all should be careful $AIA $COAI and most coins pics are edited d circulated
December 5: The European Union fines X €120 million. First penalty ever under the Digital Services Act.
December 7: The owner of X calls for the EU to be abolished.
“I mean it. Not kidding.”
8 million views. 194,000 likes. And counting.
This is not a regulatory dispute. This is the owner of the world’s town square, serving simultaneously as a senior US government official, calling for the dissolution of a 27-nation political union governing 450 million citizens and €17 trillion in combined GDP.
The sequence:
Fine issued. Ad account terminated. Abolition demanded.
Three moves. Forty-eight hours. The post-war European order now faces its most direct challenge from a private citizen since 1945.
What makes this different from every billionaire grievance before it:
He owns the platform. He advises the American president. He controls the satellites. He builds the rockets. He moves markets with single sentences.
The EU has no app store to threaten. No ad revenue to pull. No infrastructure leverage. Their only power was regulatory. And the man they fined just told 600 million monthly users their institution should cease to exist.
If Brussels escalates, they validate his narrative of overreach. If Brussels retreats, they signal regulatory capture. If Brussels ignores, they appear irrelevant.
There is no clean exit.
The question is no longer whether platforms are too powerful.
The question is whether anyone remains powerful enough to govern them.
We are watching the collision between 20th century institutions and 21st century infrastructure in real time.