cryptonews

🔥 1. BNB Price & Trading Action Today

Binance Coin (BNB) price up and strong trading momentum — BNB has been rallying, trading with a major weekly gain (~30%) and overtaking XRP in market cap, with high on-chain activity and meme token surges driving trading volume and interest around the Binance ecosystem.

📊 2. Binance’s Massive Daily Volume Supports Market Liquidity

Binance’s $20 billion+ daily spot volume is seen as a key factor supporting liquidity even in volatile market conditions, making executions tighter and reducing slippage for traders across 1,600+ pairs.

📈 3. BNB Bullish Technical Breakout / Volume Spike

BNB breaks key resistance (~$901) with a ~23% jump in trading volume over 24 hrs, signaling interest and potential continuation if price stays supported — relevant for both spot and derivatives traders.

📌 4. XRP Shows Improved Binance Order Flow

XRP’s buy/sell ratio on Binance rising, hinting at improving buyer sentiment and potential technical turnaround — useful for traders watching altcoin setups based on order flow metrics.

🌍 5. Binance Continues Dominating Global Trading Volume

Binance’s spot trading volume remains far greater than most rivals, reinforcing its position as the leading exchange where most crypto trading activity happens — a structural backdrop for global traders.

💹 6. BNB Price Growth Despite Broader Downturns

BNB price recently performing well with strong momentum, offering context for traders assessing trend strength and market bias especially in volatile or rotating markets.

#cryptonews #bitcoin #Ethereum $BTC

If you’d like, I can also provide live price levels, top gainers/losers on Binance today, or a summary of the biggest market-moving events currently impacting crypto trading.$

Ab dem 19. Januar 2026 schwankt der Markt für Bitcoin weiterhin als Reaktion auf makroökonomische Signale, regulatorische Dynamiken und die Stimmung der Anleger: BTC wurde um die mittleren $90.000 gehandelt, wobei die jüngste Volatilität mit der regulatorischen Unsicherheit in den USA und breiteren Bewegungen im Kryptomarkt verbunden ist. Der Preistrend zeigte Widerstand nahe $93.500–$95.000, während eine Welle von ETF-Zuflüssen und institutionellem Interesse die Nachfrage unterstützt hat, auch wenn technische Niveaus den Aufwärtstrend begrenzen. Die regulatorische Klarheit bleibt ein gemischtes Bild: Einige Diskussionen über Kryptogesetzgebung in den USA (wie das Digital Asset Market Clarity Act) haben Optimismus erzeugt, aber Verzögerungen und Unsicherheiten bestehen weiterhin und beeinflussen die Risikowahrnehmung. In Bezug auf das Risiko zeigen Berichte einen Anstieg von Krypto-Betrügereien und Diebstählen – mit geschätzten $17 Milliarden an gestohlenem Bitcoin im Jahr 2025 durch Identitätsdiebstahl und KI-gesteuerten Betrug – was die Sicherheits- und Betrugsanfälligkeiten im Ökosystem verdeutlicht. Darüber hinaus haben prominente Strategen wie Christopher Wood von Jefferies öffentlich ihre Allokationen von Bitcoin in Richtung traditioneller sicherer Häfen wie Gold verschoben, aufgrund langfristiger Bedenken über Bedrohungen der quantencomputergestützten Sicherheit für kryptografische Sicherheit, was die sich entwickelnden institutionellen Risikoeinschätzungen hervorhebt. Bei einem Blick in die Zukunft erstrecken sich die Möglichkeiten für Bitcoin über eine fortgesetzte institutionelle Adoption und technische Verbesserungen (einschließlich Skalierungs- und Privatsphäre-Verbesserungen) bis hin zu dem Potenzial für weitere regulatorische Klarheit, aber anhaltende Volatilität, Sicherheitsrisiken und politische Unsicherheiten bedeuten, dass risikobewusste Strategien und diversifizierte Portfolios für die Teilnehmer im Jahr 2026 entscheidend bleiben.

$XRP $TRUMP
Diese Nachricht ist nicht nur eine Ankündigung, sondern ein großes strategisches Signal zur Gestaltung der Zukunft des digitalen Geldes auf der Karte der globalen Wirtschaft.

💥 Was bedeutet die Anwesenheit von Brad Garlinghouse und Trump bei derselben Veranstaltung?

Die Weltwirtschaftsforum (WEF) ist nicht nur eine jährliche Reihe von elitären Treffen, sondern ein Forum, in dem die Allianzen und großen Themen skizziert werden, die die globalen Finanzpolitiken auf lange Sicht bestimmen werden.

The long-standing narrative of Bitcoin as “digital gold” is facing a new and far more complex challenge on Wall Street — not from short-term price volatility, but from the future of computing itself.
In early 2026, two high-profile strategists with the same last name but radically different outlooks have drawn a clear fault line in institutional thinking about Bitcoin.
On one side stands Christopher Wood of Jefferies, who has exited Bitcoin entirely, citing existential risks from quantum computing.
On the other is Cathie Wood of ARK Invest, who continues to view Bitcoin as a critical portfolio diversifier, urging investors to look beyond technical fears and focus on data-driven correlations.
This growing divide highlights how institutional capital is redefining crypto risk. The debate is no longer about whether Bitcoin is speculative or a store of value — it has shifted toward deeper questions of long-term survivability, network governance, and the true nature of hedging in a post-quantum world.
Jefferies’ Exit: A Quantum Risk Too Large to Ignore
On January 16, Christopher Wood, Global Equity Strategist at Jefferies and author of the influential Greed & Fear newsletter, made a decisive move:
he eliminated the firm’s long-standing 10% Bitcoin allocation from its model portfolio.
The capital was reallocated into more traditional hedges — 5% physical gold and 5% gold mining equities — signaling a clear philosophical shift.
Importantly, this decision was not driven by Bitcoin’s price action. Instead, Jefferies framed it as a tail-risk management choice, rooted in the belief that advances in quantum computing could eventually undermine the cryptographic foundations of Bitcoin.
From Jefferies’ perspective, this is precisely the type of low-probability, high-impact risk that long-duration capital, such as pension funds, cannot afford to ignore.
Some technologists argue that this threat may be approaching faster than markets expect.
Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, has suggested that without protocol upgrades, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically compromise Bitcoin within 2–9 years, with the highest probability clustered around 4–5 years.
He describes the current phase as a “quantum event horizon”, where the timeline for a potential attack begins to overlap with the time required for global consensus and protocol deployment.
A particularly concerning scenario is the so-called “harvest now, decrypt later” attack. In this model, adversaries collect exposed public keys today and wait until quantum hardware becomes capable of deriving private keys.
Estimates suggest that over 4 million BTC may reside in addresses vulnerable due to legacy formats or key reuse, representing a meaningful attack surface relative to total supply.
Why Many Say Quantum Is Not an Immediate Threat
Not everyone agrees with Jefferies’ conclusions.
Grayscale, one of the largest digital asset managers globally, has characterized quantum risk as a long-term issue but not a near-term market driver. While acknowledging the theoretical threat, Grayscale argues that nearly all digital infrastructure — from banking systems to government networks — will eventually need post-quantum upgrades.
This view is echoed by Andre Dragosch, Head of Research at Bitwise Europe, who pushes back against what he calls “instant doomsday narratives.”
Dragosch acknowledges vulnerabilities in older Bitcoin wallets but emphasizes the resilience of the network itself.
Bitcoin currently operates at roughly 1 zettahash per second, a level of computational security that vastly exceeds the capabilities of today’s quantum machines — and likely those of the near future.
From this standpoint, the threat is real but distant, and manageable through protocol evolution rather than an existential flaw.
ARK Invest’s Case: Bitcoin as a Non-Correlated Asset
While others debate cryptographic futures, ARK Invest remains firmly bullish — though with a subtly refined thesis.
In its 2026 outlook, Cathie Wood focuses less on ideology and more on quantitative portfolio data. Her argument centers on Bitcoin’s low correlation with traditional asset classes, which she views as its core value proposition.
Using weekly data from January 2020 to January 2026:
Bitcoin’s correlation with gold stands at 0.14
Its correlation with bonds is just 0.06
Notably, the correlation between the S&P 500 and bonds during the same period was higher than Bitcoin’s correlation with gold.
ARK argues this makes Bitcoin less of a “new gold” and more of a unique return stream — a non-correlated asset with asymmetric upside potential that can improve risk-adjusted returns in diversified portfolios.
Redefining What “Hedging” Means
For institutional observers, the takeaway is not that Bitcoin is broken — but that the institutional narrative is maturing.
Jefferies implicitly suggests that a hedge requiring contentious protocol migrations cannot be equated with physical gold, which requires no governance, coordination, or upgrades to preserve its value.
Conversely, some argue that traditional finance may face quantum disruption sooner than Bitcoin.
Banks and payment systems rely heavily on long-lived RSA and ECC keys for authentication and interbank communication. If quantum computers compromise these systems, the impact could be systemic, potentially preceding any direct threat to Bitcoin’s decentralized architecture.
ARK’s stance is that Bitcoin’s diversification benefits may justify holding it even as the asset continues to evolve.
The unresolved question remains critical:
Can Bitcoin successfully coordinate a post-quantum transition without fracturing the social consensus that underpins its monetary value?
That challenge — more than price volatility — may define Bitcoin’s institutional future.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research before making any financial decisions. The author bears no responsibility for investment outcomes.
👉 Follow for more professional crypto insights, on-chain analysis, and institutional market narratives.
#BTC #CryptoNews

$BTC
Opfer verliert 282 Millionen Dollar in Bitcoin und Litecoin aufgrund eines Betrugs über eine Hardware-Wallet.
⚠️ Social Engineering-Angriffe sind zur größten Gefahr bei Krypto-Diebstählen geworden, da Betrüger zunehmend die Identität von technischem Support der Hauptplattformen annehmen, um Benutzer zu täuschen.

Viele könnten denken, dass eine Hardware-Wallet eine nahezu absolute Sicherheit bedeutet, aber diese Art von Vorfällen zeigt, dass das stärkste Safe der Welt geöffnet wird, wenn du den Schlüssel in die Hand gibst.

XRP tritt in ein neues Kapitel ein, in dem Vertrauen langsam Zweifel ersetzt und langfristige Visionen beginnen, kurzfristigen Lärm zu überwiegen. Nach Jahren des rechtlichen Drucks und der Marktzögerlichkeit steht das Asset nun an einem Punkt, an dem Klarheit und Momentum eine neue Erzählung formen.

Die Diskussion um 2026 hat an Intensität zugenommen, insbesondere um die Idee, dass XRP sich in Richtung der acht Dollar-Marke bewegen könnte. Dies ist keine zufällige Behauptung, die durch Hype getrieben wird. Es ist eine Prognose, die in institutionellen Analyse-Modellen und sich ändernden Fundamentaldaten verwurzelt ist. Mehrere Analysten glauben, dass XRP, wenn die aktuellen Bedingungen unterstützend bleiben, historische Bewertungszonen erneut ansteuern und übertreffen könnte.