STON.fi vs TONCO: Constant Product vs Concentrated Liquidity on TON ๐Ÿ”ฅ

STON.fi uses constant-product AMM pools with fungible LP tokens on TON, while TONCO uses concentrated liquidity with NFT-based positions where providers select price ranges.

๐Ÿ“Š Liquidity Models at a Glance

- STON.fi spreads liquidity across the full price curve in shared pools.
- TONCO lets providers select specific price ranges for their capital.
- STON.fi uses passive fungible LP tokens; TONCO uses active NFT positions.

๐Ÿงฉ Liquidity Provider Experience

- STON.fi is simpler with no need to choose custom price ranges.
- TONCO offers more control and capital efficiency but requires monitoring.
- TONCO positions can stop earning fees if price moves out of range.

โšก Swaps and Quote Comparison

- Both support wallet swaps for TON-based assets.
- Best quote depends on active liquidity, fees and route for your trade size.
- STON.fi's Omniston aggregator can route through TONCO liquidity.

๐Ÿ’ก The Bottom Line

Test the same swap on both platforms to compare real quotes. The better option depends on your specific needs as a trader or LP.

Whatโ€™s your pick between @STONfi DEX and TONCO for TON swaps or liquidity? ๐Ÿ‘‡

Share your experiences or questions about these DEXs in the comments!

Not investment advice - research on your own! ๐Ÿš€

$GRAM