#openledger $OPEN @OpenLedger

OpenLedger Could Make AI Infrastructure Financially Self-Sustaining

I think about OpenLedger now. It's about how intelligence moves through a market not about helping AI work together. At first I thought it was a system to track data reward people who contribute and give value back to builders and validators.

* It seemed like a way to give credit to those who create and validate things like OpenLedger.

* The more I think about OpenLedger the more it feels like a system for scheduling shipments of intelligence.

The priority of these shipments is always being negotiated, not fixed in OpenLedger.

Then I started to notice something. Just tracking who contributed to OpenLedger isn't enough when intelligence lasts a time.

When we have lots of outputs, embeddings and datasets that can be reused in OpenLedger, the system changes.

It stops being about tracking who contributed to OpenLedger and starts being about the cost of storing all this information.

Storing information isn't neutral it costs money there's a risk of problems. It gets complicated to figure out who contributed what to OpenLedger.

This is where controlled forgetting becomes interesting in OpenLedger.

It's not about losing information. About designing a system where we decide what to keep and what to forget and that has a cost in OpenLedger.

The $OPEN token then seems like something you'd buy hoping its value goes up and more like fuel for the OpenLedger system.

People who build, contribute and validate things in OpenLedger will keep doing it if theres demand, not one-time rewards.

However I still have doubts, about OpenLedger.

Tracking who contributed is still messy people will inevitably try to game the OpenLedger system and other systems that don't use blockchain will be cheaper.

The question I keep coming to is: who pays not to store information but to get rid of it in OpenLedger?